Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. This paper addresses the unconventional application of two research paradigms in one study. Walt, S. (1990). The term paradigm was first used by Kuhn in his work The Structure of Scientific Revolution he defined research paradigm as “an integrated cluster of substantive concepts, variables and problems attached with corresponding methodological approaches and tools”.. As a researcher you will be curious to know the answers to your research questions. "Objectivity" is an ideal to strive for and can be achieved through the use of rigorous qualitative research methods. I chose these paradigms in particular because these are perspectives The confluence of realist ontology with constructionist epistemology facilitates a better understanding of evidentiary claims, especially for complex and dynamic environments. The realist paradigm and degenerative vs. progressive research programs: An appraisal of neotraditional research on Waltz’s balancing proposition. Anarchy is where there is no higher authority governing relationships between states. Realism. Next, I discuss each paradigm—pragmatism, transformative-emancipation, dialec-tics, and critical realism—while focusing explicitly on the implications that each offers for mixed methods inquiry. However, the realist paradigm also recognizes that researchers' values are inherent in all phases of the research process. Truth is negotiated through dialogue. how different research paradigms can make a distinctive influence on an overall research design. International relations consists of three major paradigms that explain the relationships between two or more states. American Political Science Review, 91(4), 899-912. in research. A critical explanation is given of how the methodological debate Realism has dominated the academic study of international relations since the end of World War II.Realists claim to offer both the most accurate explanation of state behaviour and a set of policy prescriptions (notably the balance of power between states) for ameliorating the inherent destabilizing elements of international affairs. three research paradigms: Positivist, Interpretive, and Critical. Realism focuses on the fact that there is anarchy in the international system. Waltz, K. (1979). A critical realist approach was used to augment a constructivist analysis of data in a research project seeking to explore the meaning that managers in small to medium enterprises … The origins of alliances. It commences with an outline of few philosophical ideas related to ... of paradigms – from realism to positivism and from social constructivism to pragmatism. 2. This is exemplified by the growing popularity of multiple or mixed-methods research paradigm in healthcare research. Vasquez, J. ... stating that realism is “the view that there is reality, a world, which exists independently of the researcher and which is to be discovered.” According to this definition, Pring draws a clear Thus, this objective reality cannot be apprehended in a perfect way. Traditional approaches in qualitative research have adopted one research paradigm linked to an established typology. Theory is a building block for a research. (1997). Theories are set of logically related symbols that Paradigms are conceptual and practical “tools” that are used to solve specific research problems; in other words, paradigms function as heuristics in social research (Abbott 2004, p. 42).Each paradigm has a different perspective on the axiology, ontology, epistemology, methodology, and rhetoric of research. liberalism, realism, neo-realism, constructivism, feminist theory, critical theory, etc. Keywords: Realism, Security, Paradigm, Philosophy Introduction Theory plays a crucial role in the formulation, understanding and solution of a research problem.